FLC | NSF-funded astronomers may have discovered a signature of life on Venus

NSF-funded astronomers may have discovered a signature of life on Venus

September 16, 2020

The search for life beyond Earth has largely revolved around Mars, our rocky red neighbor. Now, in a surprising twist, an international team of astronomers funded in part by the National Science Foundation have observed what may be signs of life in the clouds of our other, even closer planetary neighbor: Venus.

The researchers made the detection using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile and the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope in Hawaii. ALMA, an international astronomy facility, is a partnership of the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO), the NSF in the U.S., and the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) of Japan in cooperation with the Republic of Chile.

The scientists have not found direct evidence of living organisms on Venus. If the observation is indeed associated with life, it must be an "aerial" life-form in Venus' clouds -- the only habitable portion of an otherwise a scorched and inhospitable world. The discovery was published on September 14 by Nature Astronomy.

The astronomers detected a spectral fingerprint, or light-based signature, of the gas phosphine in Venus' atmosphere. Scientists had previously shown that if this poisonous gas were detected on a rocky, terrestrial planet, it could be produced only by a living organism.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) followed up the new observation with an exhaustive analysis to see whether anything other than life could have produced phosphine in Venus' harsh, sulfuric environment. Based on the many scenarios they considered, the scientists conclude that there is no explanation for the phosphine detected in Venus' clouds other than the presence of life.

"It's very hard to prove a negative," said MIT researcher Clara Sousa-Silva. "Now astronomers will think of all the ways to justify phosphine without life. Please do, because we are at the end of our possibilities to show abiotic processes that can make phosphine."

Adds Joe Pesce, a program director in NSF's Division of Astronomy, "This is an interesting and intriguing result. It's science in action -- now we need to verify and explain."

Read the study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020-1174-4